[patch i386,c,c++]: PR/12171 - calling convention omitted in error message

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Tue Jan 4 22:37:00 GMT 2011


On 01/01/2011 01:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Well, as here no further agreement was found, I post here the
> alternative suggested by Joseph. I am open-minded which approach will
> be chosen. I just want to fix this long pending issue.
> I split up this patch in two parts. The first simply extends the
> struct attribute_spec by new member 'on_diagnostic' and extends the
> the uses of this structure by this new field. This new member
> specifies if the attribute shall be show on diagnostic output, or not.

This seems like a reasonable approach, but I'd prefer to describe/name 
the field as indicating that the attribute affects type compatibility 
(since that's why we want to see the attribute in diagnostics), and 
making the default comp_type_attributes use that information.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list