[patch] Do not generate discriminator directive in strict mode
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@adacore.com
Wed Apr 20 19:26:00 GMT 2011
> How is this not redundant with the existing
>
> /* The discriminator column was added in dwarf4. Simplify the below
> by simply removing it if we're not supposed to output it. */
> if (dwarf_version < 4 && dwarf_strict)
> discriminator = 0;
>
> check near the top of the function?
Obviously I missed this recent change, sorry. So the question is: would the
change be appropriate for the release branches, where we emit the directive
unconditionally, i.e 4.5 and 4.6 branches, or would mine be safer for them?
This directive apparently confuses (some versions of) the Wind River debugger.
--
Eric Botcazou
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list