[C++0x patch] implement range-based for loops

[Jason Merrill]

On 09/11/2010 09:35 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/11/2010 08:45 AM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
>> Given that nobody in their minds will use "-fno-for-scope -std=c++0x"
>> this decision is hardly relevant, so I vote for the simpler
>> implementation: option Two.
>
> OK, makes sense.

In case you hadn't noticed, I applied your earlier patch last night 
(with a few whitespace fixes and the variable name change), so this 
change should be relative to that.

Jason