[PATCH] combine: Fix subst_low_luid setting - bootstrap failure on s390x
Andreas Krebbel
krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Sep 6 14:24:00 GMT 2010
Hi,
the attached patches fixes a misoptimization in combine. Due to a
wrong setting of the subst_low_luid field a wrong nonzero mask has
been used what led to a miscompilation of genpreds on s390x. Probably
a simple copy and paste bug.
Fixed with the attached patch.
Bootstrapped on s390x.
Bye,
-Andreas-
2010-09-06 Andreas Krebbel <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
* combine.c (try_combine): Set subst_low_luid to i0.
2010-09-06 Andreas Krebbel <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
* gcc.dg/20100906-1.c: New testcase.
Index: gcc/combine.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/combine.c.orig
--- gcc/combine.c
*************** try_combine (rtx i3, rtx i2, rtx i1, rtx
*** 3138,3144 ****
}
n_occurrences = 0;
! subst_low_luid = DF_INSN_LUID (i1);
newpat = subst (newpat, i0dest, i0src, 0,
i0_feeds_i1_n && i0dest_in_i0src);
substed_i0 = 1;
--- 3138,3144 ----
}
n_occurrences = 0;
! subst_low_luid = DF_INSN_LUID (i0);
newpat = subst (newpat, i0dest, i0src, 0,
i0_feeds_i1_n && i0dest_in_i0src);
substed_i0 = 1;
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c
===================================================================
*** /dev/null
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20100906-1.c
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,48 ----
+ /* { dg-do run } */
+ /* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+ /* This testcase got misoptimized by combine due to a wrong setting of
+ subst_low_luid in try_combine. */
+
+ enum rtx_code {
+ A, B
+ };
+
+ void abort (void);
+
+ struct rtx_def {
+ __extension__ enum rtx_code code:16;
+ };
+ typedef struct rtx_def *rtx;
+
+ void __attribute__((noinline))
+ add_constraint (unsigned char is_a)
+ {
+ if (is_a)
+ abort ();
+ }
+
+ void __attribute__((noinline))
+ foo (rtx defn)
+ {
+ switch (defn->code)
+ {
+ case A:
+ case B:
+ add_constraint (defn->code == A);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ int
+ main ()
+ {
+ struct rtx_def r;
+
+ r.code = B;
+
+ foo (&r);
+ return 0;
+ }
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list