[PATCH] replace LIBGCC2_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN with __BYTE_ORDER__

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Fri Oct 22 21:35:00 GMT 2010


On 10/22/2010 11:32 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 08:19 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>> Instead of going with __BYTE_ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and such, I chose
>> __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and such, as these values can usefully be reused
>> for making LIBGCC2_FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN go away.
>> codesearch.google.com turns up nothing for such identifiers, so we are
>> probably safe in using them.
> 
> Ok by me.

For avoidance of doubt, this is OK.  (In case you didn't take Richard's
message as an approval.)

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list