Ping ! gengtype plugin improvement last2round - patch 2 [verbosity]
Basile Starynkevitch
basile@starynkevitch.net
Sun Oct 17 22:07:00 GMT 2010
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:52:15 +0200
Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:58:55 +0200
> Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> >
> > Committed as revision 165470 to the trunk, with the requested space changes.
>
> The next patch chunk
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01706.html adds verbosity
> to gengtype.
So I am pinging http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01262.html
assuming that I will take into account the indentation tricks found by
Laurynas in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01300.html
(or do reviewers expect me to resend a patch with the indentation
issues corrected before even reading it?)
I don't understand how I can still hope to get the gengtype plugin
improvements into 4.6. Stage 1 is closing in ten days and I have five
other patch chunks to push... That would mean a patch chunk commited
every other day, and the current review rythm is much much slower...
I do understand that very few reviewers know gengtype and that those
few that know it (e.g. Diego) have perhaps thousand of patches in their
review queue, and need to go to sleep sometimes!
Or could I defend at the GCC Summit the idea that patches to gengtype
which don't change the generated code should be acceptable in stage 2?
Maybe meeting at the GCC Summit will be enough, but I am not sure!
Cheers.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list