-fwhopr and -flto options reorg

Jan Hubicka hubicka@ucw.cz
Thu Nov 11 23:41:00 GMT 2010


> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >> -flto=jobserv sounds confusing.  -flto=auto?  Somehow it sounds more
> >> natural (to me) to make partition strategy an argument for -flto
> >> instead of make the parallelism level.
> >
> > Well, I have no preferences here.  We can have -flto=auto, but we want to get this
> > from environment rendering spelling "jobserv" out redundant anyway.
> >
> > Because the mode needs only with "+" in the Makefile rule, perhaps making it jobserv
> > rather than auto will drive users to actually read the docs and figure out they need
> > Makefile update to get it working...
> >>
> >> -flto=[none|balanced|....]
> >>
> >> -flto-parallel=[n|auto]
> >
> > I think it makes omre sense to have -flto= to control parallelism since it is what
> > user care about.
> > -flto-partition is something we use for debugging so I do not care it is longer to
> > type.
> 
> Ok -- I thought the partition scheme is related to scalability.
> Besides, as you mentioned below, -flto-patitition=none has its special
> implication?

We have --param lto-partitions parameter for scalability.
-flto-partition is used to specify either balanced (the default user wants to
keep all the time), 1to1 for testsuite testing and none for compiling everything
as one partition (and consequently disabling WHOPR, too)

> 
> >>
> >> Does -flto imply -fwpa by default or not?
> > -fwpa and -fltrans are used internaly to pass down the stage of WHOPR and -flto is WHOPR now
> > unless you specify -flto-partition=none, so yes.
> 
> Why using partition option to control wpa or not? Is it better to use -fno-wpa?

WPA is one of stages of WHOPR and we concluded that user wants to know nothing
about that.  So -fno-wpa to turn off whole WHOPR does not sound any more
intuitive to users than -flto-partition=none.
-fltrans and -fwpa are not user visible in any way since they are accepted only by
lto1 frontend and supplied by plugin or collect2.

Honza
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David
> 
> >
> > Honza
> >



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list