-fwhopr and -flto options reorg

Diego Novillo dnovillo@google.com
Thu Nov 11 22:27:00 GMT 2010


On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 16:48, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:43:34PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:30:13PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> > > On 10-11-11 16:08 , Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > > >Hi,
>> > > >here is updated patch.  Removing flag_whopr is probably easier than keeping in around
>> > > >given that it is usually used in conjunction with flag_lto.
>> > >
>> > > Great!  Thanks.
>> >
>> > Previously we were running most of the testsuites iterating over flags
>> > with -flto and -fwhopr.  Is that going to change to just -flto now (i.e.
>> > fewer tests)?  That would be very much appreciated...
>> No, I use -flto and -flto-partition=none (that is equivalent of previous -flto).
>>
>> I am not sure how important is to run all the tests with both settings, perhaps we can drop
>> -flto-partition=none for all except for LTO tests or so.
>
> I bet most of the non-LTO tests are small enough that they wouldn't be
> partitioned into multiple partitions anyway, right?

Perhaps.  At the time we were developing whopr, the size of the tests
was usually not a big factor.  Several of the problems we were testing
occurred simply by enabling the whopr machinery.  This is much better
supported today, so we could probably do it.


Diego.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list