Revision 166517 caused PR 46414
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Nov 10 15:27:00 GMT 2010
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> The complette unrilling seems sane here.
>> This seems like good idea to me and i am not quite sure why 32bit compilation does not do the
>> transofrm. I will check now.
>
> The reason is word size. We compute move costs based on this, so vectorized moves are more expensive
> in 32bit cost model than 64bit.
> Perhaps there is way to hook vectorizer cost model in here?
>
Shouldn't we use vector size to compute move cost for vector move?
--
H.J.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list