[PATCH] GCC symdb (gcc/) 2 of 2

[Yunfeng ZHANG]

gcc/ChangeLog is in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00306.html,
the whole patch includes two parts -- msg00306.html and ms00307.html. The first
includes patch description, my change on libcpp/ and my gcc plugin code/test
(attachment), later is for gcc/.

2010/5/1 Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>:
> On 23/04/2010 02:33, Yunfeng ZHANG wrote:
>> Does gcc still work on my patch?
>
>  Hi again, sorry for taking some time to respond, and thank you for being
> persistent and patient.
>
>  You didn't supply a ChangeLog entry yet, so here is one for the patch:
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>        * plugin.def (PLUGIN_CPP_TOKEN): New DEFEVENT.
>        (PLUGIN_C_TOKEN): Likewise.
>        * c-lex.c: Include plugin.h.
>        (c_lex_with_flags): Invoke PLUGIN_CPP_TOKEN callback.
>        * c-parser.c (CPP_KEYWORD): Delete from here...
>        (c_id_kind): ... likewise ...
>        (c_token): ... and likewise.
>        (c_lex_one_token): Invoke PLUGIN_C_TOKEN callback.
>        * plugin.c (register_callback): Handle PLUGIN_C_TOKEN and
>        PLUGIN_CPP_TOKEN events.
>        (invoke_plugin_callbacks): Likewise.
>        * plugins.texi (enum plugin_event): Mention new event types.
>        * c-common.h: Include c-pragma.h.
>        (CPP_KEYWORD): Define here instead ...
>        (c_id_kind): ... likewise ...
>        (c_token): ... and likewise.
>
>  Joseph, I don't have a fencepost account yet; can you verify that YZ's
> paperwork has been processed, and if so review the original patch at:
>        http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00307.html
>
>  It looks basically right, but I think it needs a patch to Makefile.in to
> adjust header dependencies?  (Do we really still need to track these manually?)
>
>    cheers,
>      DaveK
>
>