WIP patch, RFC: ARM ldm/stm peephole rewrite

[Dave Korn]

On 25/03/2010 17:57, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 14:18 +0000, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:

>> Some parts of your patch seem to try and generate {ldm/stm}{ib/db} which
> 
> s/ib/da/ in the above sentence. 

  Replacing "ib" with "da":

>> Some parts of your patch seem to try and generate {ldm/stm}{da/db} which

> It's {ldm /stm}{ib/da} that's not supported in Thumb2.

  I'm not sure that cleared things up as much as you intended!

    cheers,
      DaveK