patch for bug 42640

[Richard Guenther]

On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pop wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 13:11, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On 03/01/2010 07:54 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >> This looks good to me, but I cannot approve it.
> >> Richi, could you also have a look at this patch?
> >>
> > Well, for sure you don't want a testcase printfs-based like that... ;)
> > Also, the ChangeLog entry needs some trivial stylistic tweaks, I think.
> >
> 
> Here is an updated patch correcting these issues.

The patch is ok with

        * (tree-loop-distribution.c): Replaced the assignment from the

proper changelog format is

	* tree-loop-distribution.c (update_phis_for_loop_copy): Replaced

Thanks,
Richard.