[gimple] assignments to volatile

[Mike Stump]

On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> did you not read my original problem statement?

I did read it.

> You seem to be ignoring associated issues that come with that interpretation, which I mentioned.

I'm aware of them.  We'd all benefit if the C and C++ committees refined the language to make things more clear and to match each other.

> Could you clarify what you also claim the following expression-statements should reread?

Below is my take on what we should do.

> vobj;

read.

> vobj = data;

no re-read

> expr, vobj = data;

no re-read.