Partial inlining

[Jan Hubicka]

> On 06/26/2010 11:16 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>> You seem to be consistently on less dumping by default than me.  I find dumping
> >>> of reasons why split points are not accepted quite useful, but I guess using
> >>> -details is not problem.
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> This breaks C++:
> >>
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44671
> >>     
> > This does not reproduce for me (at least with "Fix PHI handling in ipa-split" patch my tree)
> > I am now re-trying from scratch.
> >   
> The problem is definitely there. See, for example:
> 
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-06/msg02660.html
> 
> and I have just reproduced it myself once more with r161427.

It is interesting indeed, I get
                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            7160
# of expected failures          61
# of unsupported tests          341

on build on gcc14 compilation farm.  On gcc17 the problem however reproduce and goes away when the
testsuite_shard is comiled with -fno-partial-inlining.

Honza
> 
> Paolo.