[PATCH] VECify record_layout_info.pending_statics
Richard Guenther
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Fri Jun 18 09:31:00 GMT 2010
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> As $SUBJECT suggests. More TREE_LIST removal, yada, yada.
>
> Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> -Nathan
>
> * tree.h (record_layout_info): Change type of pending_statics field
> to a VEC.
> * stor-layout.c (start_record_layout): Store NULL into
> pending_statics.
> (debug_rli): Adjust for new type of pending_statics field.
> (place_field): Likewise.
> (finish_record_layout): Likewise.
>
> --- a/gcc/stor-layout.c
> +++ b/gcc/stor-layout.c
> @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ start_record_layout (tree t)
> rli->offset = size_zero_node;
> rli->bitpos = bitsize_zero_node;
> rli->prev_field = 0;
> - rli->pending_statics = 0;
> + rli->pending_statics = NULL;
> rli->packed_maybe_necessary = 0;
> rli->remaining_in_alignment = 0;
>
> @@ -827,10 +827,13 @@ debug_rli (record_layout_info rli)
> if (rli->packed_maybe_necessary)
> fprintf (stderr, "packed may be necessary\n");
>
> - if (rli->pending_statics)
> + if (!VEC_empty (tree, rli->pending_statics))
> {
> + unsigned ix;
> + tree t;
> fprintf (stderr, "pending statics:\n");
> - debug_tree (rli->pending_statics);
> + for (ix = 0; VEC_iterate (tree, rli->pending_statics, ix, t); ix++)
> + debug_tree (t);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1041,8 +1044,7 @@ place_field (record_layout_info rli, tree field)
> it *after* the record is laid out. */
> if (TREE_CODE (field) == VAR_DECL)
> {
> - rli->pending_statics = tree_cons (NULL_TREE, field,
> - rli->pending_statics);
> + VEC_safe_push (tree, gc, rli->pending_statics, field);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -1718,15 +1720,15 @@ finish_record_layout (record_layout_info rli, int free_p)
>
> /* Lay out any static members. This is done now because their type
> may use the record's type. */
> - while (rli->pending_statics)
> - {
> - layout_decl (TREE_VALUE (rli->pending_statics), 0);
> - rli->pending_statics = TREE_CHAIN (rli->pending_statics);
> - }
> + while (!VEC_empty (tree, rli->pending_statics))
> + layout_decl (VEC_pop (tree, rli->pending_statics), 0);
>
> /* Clean up. */
> if (free_p)
> - free (rli);
> + {
> + VEC_free (tree, gc, rli->pending_statics);
> + free (rli);
> + }
> }
>
>
> --- a/gcc/tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
> @@ -4325,7 +4325,7 @@ typedef struct record_layout_info_s
> tree prev_field;
> /* The static variables (i.e., class variables, as opposed to
> instance variables) encountered in T. */
> - tree pending_statics;
> + VEC(tree,gc) *pending_statics;
> /* Bits remaining in the current alignment group */
> int remaining_in_alignment;
> /* True if we've seen a packed field that didn't have normal
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list