[CFT, try 9] Emulated tls rewrite

[Jack Howarth]

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:12:53AM +0100, IainS wrote:
> Hi Jack, Richard,
>
> On 22 Jul 2010, at 03:32, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>   I am still seeing one additional failure in the gfortran testsuite
>> (with the expanded tls test set) under your emutls patch
>
> 8b or...
> ... 8b + http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01671.html ?
>
>> Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/ 
>> gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/sw/src/fink.build/ 
>> gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../ /sw/src/ 
>> fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20100721/gcc/testsuite/ 
>> gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.22.6.f90   -O   -fopenmp -S  -o a.22.6.s  
>>   (timeout = 300)
>> /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20100721/gcc/testsuite/ 
>> gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.22.6.f90:4:0: sorry, unimplemented:  
>> thread-local COMMON data not implemented^M
>
> I do _not_ see this on either i686-darwin9 or x86_64-darwin10

Iain,
   Apparently this must have been fixed with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01671.html.
I don't see the problem with that and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01528.html
applied to r162414 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.
                     Jack
>
> with r162403 + emutls-8b.
>
> .. . sorry, I haven't tried the increment, been busy with bootstrap  
> issues..
> ...  (although the increment  looks to be still in flux)..
>
> Iain