[patch win32]: fix for PR target/41943

Ozkan Sezer sezeroz@gmail.com
Thu Jul 22 16:08:00 GMT 2010


On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 09:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> We're not going to do that either.  The include order for all gcc is
>>> gcc-private > fixincludes > system.
>>>
>>
>> That patch doesn't change the order unconditionally. Why is a
>> target option is unacceptable?
>
> Because I think it's conceptually flawed.
>
> The few headers that are in gcc-private contain that which may be
> considered internal to the compiler.  Thus it should have the
> highest priority.
>
>
> r~
>

Kai, then this leaves us with the option of providing a USER_H in
our target, even if we don't like it.

--
Ozkan



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list