PING -- MicroBlaze target support patches
Gerald Pfeifer
gerald@pfeifer.com
Sat Jul 10 18:04:00 GMT 2010
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Michael Eager wrote:
> Could someone please review these patches?
>
> Add support for Xilinx MicroBlaze processor:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01903.html
This is okay with three small changes.
Please use "Do not" instead of "Don't" in invoke.texi.
Use proper markup for -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss in the same.
Similarly, please use @var in
Supported values are in the format vX.YY.Z, where X is a major version,
YY is the minor version, and Z is compatiblity code.
in invoke.texi.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01905.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01908.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01907.html
These three I cannot review/approve, but the strike me as pretty
straightforward, not touching lots of core code? Where are we
regarding this? Is this stuck somewhere?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01906.html
This is fine, too. For the announcement on the main page, let's say
"processor" (lower case) and there is a closing </p> missing on the
changes.html page.
Good work!
Gerald
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list