RFA: hook doc patch (61/112): TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_SPEC_DS, TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_CHECKED_DS, TARGET_SCHED_SKIP_RTX_P

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Joern Rennecke wrote:
>> And couldn't we just say
>> 
>>       * tm.texi (TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_SPEC_DS,
>>       TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_CHECKED_DS, TARGET_SCHED_SKIP_RTX_P):
>> Document.
> Please take this up with Richard Kenner, he told me something 1995-ish
> not to do that.

Okay, then let's leave it as is.  I don't feel sufficiently strongly about 
this (and the GNU coding standards actually suggest closing each line with 
")" and starting again with "(" when it comes to multiple functions, so my
original proposal wouldn't be right from that perspective).

Gerald