libstdc++/21772 part 3

[Paolo Carlini]

On 01/01/2010 12:30 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Turns out I was missing that we are testing *only* in C++0x mode. I have
> re-added the tests, sorry. Still, to be honest, I think we are pretty
> sloppy in making sure we are instantiating with types strictly of
> literal type only, actually, I'm pretty sure we aren't. But we can fix that.
>   
... also, some C++ front-end work is necessary to adjust the treatment
of unions for C++0x (vs literal types as data members, in particular)

Paolo.