libstdc++/21772 part 3

[Paolo Carlini]

On 01/01/2010 11:23 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Ok, thanks. As a follow-up, I have removed, for now at least, the
> basic_string (and vstring, which still follows the same specifications)
> tests, because we can't instantiate for non-POD (per 21/1).
>   
Turns out I was missing that we are testing *only* in C++0x mode. I have
re-added the tests, sorry. Still, to be honest, I think we are pretty
sloppy in making sure we are instantiating with types strictly of
literal type only, actually, I'm pretty sure we aren't. But we can fix that.

Paolo.