[C++ Patch] PR 34272, v2 + PR 42062

[Jason Merrill]

On 12/03/2009 07:29 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> -  gcc_assert (TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args)
> -	      == TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARMS (tmpl)));
> +  if (TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args)
> +      != TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARMS (tmpl)))
> +    return error_mark_node;

I'm uncomfortable about returning error_mark_node without giving an 
error.  Why can't we return error_mark_node at the point where we give 
an error?

Jason