Review microblaze.md, suggestions

[Richard Henderson]

On 02/04/2010 05:16 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
> The original port was done by someone else some long time
> ago. I'm sure that there are design decisions which I would
> have made differently if I were starting from a clean slate.
> So your comment about the 'R' constraint is perhaps misdirected.

A collective you -- "yall".

> If all of the areas which you suggest be designed differently
> must be done before the backend can be accepted, then I will
> see if Xilinx is interested in pursuing this, or if they want
> to withdraw the patch.

There is a reason why *this* message was titled "suggestions".

That said, the way you're talking sounds like you're planning on getting 
the port committed to mainline and then not working on it any more?  Is 
this true, or am I mis-interpreting your protestations?


r~