Ping Ping Ping: [PATCH] RFA: Add a small indication to warnings that are promoted to errors
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Mon Feb 1 14:53:00 GMT 2010
Simon Baldwin wrote:
> I have not suggested that -Werror no longer present warnings as
> errors. The patch does not affect this any way.
I understand that.
I question whether it is necessary that users see an
error-promoted-from-a-warning differently than an
error-that-was-always-an-error.
As I've indicated, if we do think it's necessary then:
>> error: [WNNNN] <the message>
is my first choice. My second choice is to add [was warning] or,
perhaps, [disable with -W] or [disable with -Wfoobar].
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list