[patch c++]:PR/15774 - Conflicting function decls not diagnosed (this time really for 15774)

[Jason Merrill]

On 12/25/2010 11:00 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hmm, not sure. Case 2 is simply ill-formed, but doesn't cause wrong
> code. But case 1 in fact can produce wrong code. See as expample

I agree that we should reject it, I'm just saying we should reject it in 
a different function.  :)

Jason