Is eliminate_regs_in_insn allowed to generate invalid instruction?

[Ian Lance Taylor]

"Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com> writes:

> The way some ports take around this issue is to recognize, in your
> EXTRA_CONSTRAINT_STR implementation, certain forms of complex
> addresses as those which you *know* reload will already have marked
> for reloading, and therefore *accept* them (if they'd otherwise
> match the constraint).

Seems like you could also just use find_replacement if
reload_in_progress is true.

Ian