RFA (mmix): FIx PR46739

[Richard Henderson]

On 12/06/2010 09:21 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I don't think the code is correct either before or after this patch; 
> aren't the halves of a CONST_DOUBLE in units of HOST_WIDE_INT not long?  

Yes, they are.

> (Maybe double-int.[ch] 
> should have functions to convert a double_int value to either signed or 
> unsigned HOST_WIDEST_INT.)

Sure.  double_int_to_{s,u}widest{,_p}?


r~