[PATCH] Fix sel-sched ICE with __builtin_unreachable (PR rtl-optimization/45353)
Vladimir N. Makarov
vmakarov@redhat.com
Fri Aug 20 17:32:00 GMT 2010
On 08/20/2010 11:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The testcase in the patch ICEs, because with __builtin_unreachable ()
> there is a basic block containing just notes, followed by BARRIER, and
> BARRIER doesn't have BLOCK_FOR_INSN. BARRIERs are always after the bb
> though, so we should handle it like BLOCK_FOR_INSN (head) != bb.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux with yes,rtl checking,
> ok for trunk?
>
>
Sure. Thanks, Jakub.
> 2010-08-20 Jakub Jelinek<jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR rtl-optimization/45353
> * sel-sched-ir.c (sel_bb_head): Return NULL even if next_nonnote_insn
> after bb_note is a BARRIER.
>
> * gcc.dg/pr45353.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/sel-sched-ir.c.jj 2010-07-09 13:44:24.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/sel-sched-ir.c 2010-08-20 14:14:57.000000000 +0200
> @@ -4326,7 +4326,7 @@ sel_bb_head (basic_block bb)
> note = bb_note (bb);
> head = next_nonnote_insn (note);
>
> - if (head&& BLOCK_FOR_INSN (head) != bb)
> + if (head&& (BARRIER_P (head) || BLOCK_FOR_INSN (head) != bb))
> head = NULL_RTX;
> }
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr45353.c.jj 2010-08-20 14:17:44.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr45353.c 2010-08-20 14:17:24.000000000 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* PR rtl-optimization/45353 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling" } */
> +
> +void
> +foo ()
> +{
> + __builtin_unreachable ();
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list