[DRAGONEGG] Expose 4 functions in i386.c

[Jack Howarth]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:30:02AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> >> I see how Jack complained about gcc becoming Linux centric but then
> >> draggonegg is very x86 centric. Really I think target hooks are the way
> >> to go and this should not be accepted at this point.
> >
> > I completely agree that target hooks are the way to go.  That's not the
> > issue here.  The question is whether it is nonetheless ok to apply this
> > to the gcc-4.5 branch in order to make things easier for my users, even
> > though it is technically the wrong thing to do in the long term.
> 
> No, we don't want this kind of kludges - you can apply them locally.
> 
> Richard.

Richard,
   Can we at least get...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00545.html

into gcc-4_5-branch so that darwin can build plugins?
            Jack
ps The trunk version of the same patch is posted at...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00610.html

> 
> > Ciao,
> >
> > Duncan.
> >