[DRAGONEGG] Expose 4 functions in i386.c

Duncan Sands baldrick@free.fr
Tue Apr 13 16:21:00 GMT 2010


Hi Andrew,

> I see how Jack complained about gcc becoming Linux centric but then
> draggonegg is very x86 centric. Really I think target hooks are the way
> to go and this should not be accepted at this point.

I completely agree that target hooks are the way to go.  That's not the
issue here.  The question is whether it is nonetheless ok to apply this
to the gcc-4.5 branch in order to make things easier for my users, even
though it is technically the wrong thing to do in the long term.

Ciao,

Duncan.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list