PR c++/28511

[NightStrike]

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:16 PM, NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Fabien CHÊNE <fabien.chene@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The problem is that gcc incorrectly accepts default-initialization of
>>> const members and references members, when using the operator new
>>> without the new-initializer.
>>> I 've added a check in build_new_1 to fix that early so that 'new A'
>>> can be rejected (without assigning it).
>>>
>>> bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fab
>>>
>>
>> PR28511 looks like it's closed as invalid:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28511
>>
>> Am I looking at the wrong thing?
>
> The number in the subject is wrong, it should be 25811 :).
>
> -- Pinski
>

Ah, that explains it.  Then allow me to ping for a response on the fix
to this PR :)