[PATCH] Fix a VTA ICE caused by reload DEBUG_INSN substitution
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Tue Sep 22 09:29:00 GMT 2009
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Â Ok for
> > trunk?
>
> Ok. I suppose you have a testcase?
It is reload, so coming with a reliable testcase is hard.
I only have a testcase that triggers on redhat/gcc-4_4-branch, so I'm not
sure it is that useful, as almost any small change in any preceeding pass
can make it disappear or appear again:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -g -funroll-loops -std=gnu99" } */
struct S
{
unsigned long s1;
int **s2;
};
struct T
{
unsigned long t1, t2;
};
struct U
{
int u1, u2;
unsigned long u3;
};
struct V
{
int v1, v3;
struct T *v2;
struct U *v4;
};
struct W
{
int w1;
struct V **w2;
};
struct S *foo1 (void);
int *foo2 (void);
void
test (struct W *w)
{
for (int i = 0; i < w->w1; i++)
{
struct V *v = w->w2[i];
struct S *t = foo1 ();
if (!t)
for (int j; j < v->v1;)
{
struct T *q = &v->v2[j];
t += (q->t2 - q->t1) * 45000L;
}
for (; v->v3;)
{
struct U *v4 = (struct U *) &v->v4;
if (v4->u1 && v4->u2 >= 0 && v4->u2)
{
int *s = foo2 ();
if (!s)
for (int k = 0; k <= v4->u2; k++)
{
struct T *q = &v->v2[k];
if (k == v4->u2)
v4->u3 += (q->t1) * 1000000;
}
t->s2[t->s1] = s;
}
}
int *s = foo2 ();
if (!t)
t->s2[t->s1] = s;
}
}
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list