rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi

[David Edelsohn]

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Segher
Boessenkool<segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

>> I took your patches, and fixed some of the TARGET_POWERPC64 issues that I
>> had
>> in my original code.  Assuming there are no additional regressions, is
>> this ok
>> to apply?
>
> I would prefer to keep the patches separate; mine is a bug fix, yours is
> an essentially independent improvement.

I agree with Segher.  We have had too many problems recently caused by
merging bugfixes and cleanups and improvements at the same time in the
same patch.

Is there any difference between Segher's patch and the version of his
changes in your tree, Mike?

Thanks, David