[PR41276, PR41307] don't leak VALUEs into VAR_LOCATION NOTEs

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Sep  9, 2009, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:

>> Here's what I'm testing.  Ok to install if it passes regtesting?
> I think it must be specified whether the return value of the callback is 
> expanded again or not.  With this latest patch it would be for VALUEs but 
> wouldn't for SUBREGs; any possibility to unify that either way?

Thanks, good catch, I'd failed to adjust the VALUE case to the API
refinement.

Here's the revised patch I'm testing.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vta-cselib-subreg-of-value-more-pr41276.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 5417 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20090909/96e1b17f/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer