rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi
Segher Boessenkool
segher@kernel.crashing.org
Tue Sep 8 19:48:00 GMT 2009
For a memory reference like [A+B], the splitters for bswapdi should
split this to SI [A+B] and [(A+4)+B]; the code however does [B] and
[(A+4)+B]. This actually ICEd (on a default Linux kernel build)
because B was r0.
Also changes some of the register constraints which used "b" while
they could be "r".
Also fixes a few instances where TARGET_32BIT used 64-bit math for
addresses.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux, no regressions. Okay
to apply?
2009-09-08 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (bswapdi2_64bit): Fix
unnecessarily stringent constraints. Fix address
calculation in the splitters.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
index 2752adb..701d0a0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
@@ -2421,8 +2421,8 @@
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "reg_or_mem_operand" "=&r,Z,??&r")
(bswap:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "reg_or_mem_operand" "Z,r,r")))
(clobber (match_scratch:DI 2 "=&b,&b,&r"))
- (clobber (match_scratch:DI 3 "=&b,&r,&r"))
- (clobber (match_scratch:DI 4 "=&b,X,&r"))]
+ (clobber (match_scratch:DI 3 "=&r,&r,&r"))
+ (clobber (match_scratch:DI 4 "=&r,X,&r"))]
"TARGET_POWERPC64 && !TARGET_LDBRX
&& (REG_P (operands[0]) || REG_P (operands[1]))"
"#"
@@ -2454,12 +2454,13 @@
if (GET_CODE (addr1) == PLUS)
{
emit_insn (gen_adddi3 (op2, XEXP (addr1, 0), GEN_INT (4)));
- addr1 = XEXP (addr1, 1);
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, op2, XEXP (addr1, 1));
}
else
- emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
-
- addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, op2, addr1);
+ {
+ emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, op2, addr1);
+ }
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
{
@@ -2484,7 +2485,7 @@
(clobber (match_operand:DI 2 "gpc_reg_operand" ""))
(clobber (match_operand:DI 3 "gpc_reg_operand" ""))
(clobber (match_operand:DI 4 "" ""))]
- "TARGET_POWERPC64 && reload_completed && !TARGET_LDBRX"
+ "TARGET_POWERPC64 && !TARGET_LDBRX && reload_completed"
[(const_int 0)]
"
{
@@ -2503,12 +2504,13 @@
if (GET_CODE (addr1) == PLUS)
{
emit_insn (gen_adddi3 (op2, XEXP (addr1, 0), GEN_INT (4)));
- addr1 = XEXP (addr1, 1);
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, op2, XEXP (addr1, 1));
}
else
- emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
-
- addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, op2, addr1);
+ {
+ emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, op2, addr1);
+ }
emit_insn (gen_lshrdi3 (op3, src, GEN_INT (32)));
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
@@ -2582,13 +2584,14 @@
addr1 = XEXP (src, 0);
if (GET_CODE (addr1) == PLUS)
{
- emit_insn (gen_adddi3 (op2, XEXP (addr1, 0), GEN_INT (4)));
- addr1 = XEXP (addr1, 1);
+ emit_insn (gen_addsi3 (op2, XEXP (addr1, 0), GEN_INT (4)));
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (SImode, op2, XEXP (addr1, 1));
}
else
- emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
-
- addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (DImode, op2, addr1);
+ {
+ emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (SImode, op2, addr1);
+ }
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
{
@@ -2627,12 +2630,13 @@
if (GET_CODE (addr1) == PLUS)
{
emit_insn (gen_addsi3 (op2, XEXP (addr1, 0), GEN_INT (4)));
- addr1 = XEXP (addr1, 1);
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (SImode, op2, XEXP (addr1, 1));
}
else
- emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
-
- addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (SImode, op2, addr1);
+ {
+ emit_move_insn (op2, GEN_INT (4));
+ addr2 = gen_rtx_PLUS (SImode, op2, addr1);
+ }
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
{
--
1.6.4.2.265.g3f1f09
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list