[patch] Change argument name

[Rafael Espindola]

> There was no actual patch in this message.

Sorry about that. Attached now.

> I think that for a header file like this it's OK to use parameter
> names.  A header file like this is already susceptible to macro
> breakage in that it defines struct fields.

So, is the patch OK?

> Ian
>

Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: argname.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 407 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20091009/63452216/attachment.bin>