{RFA] PowerPC e500mc64 core support
David Edelsohn
dje.gcc@gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 16:10:00 GMT 2009
Edmar,
Creating TARGET_E500MC64 is incorrect, the macro should represent a
feature, not a processor. The rs6000.c tests should use
PROCESSOR_E500MC64.
The change to floatdidf2 pattern does not make sense because it
already tests TARGET_POWERPC64 and e500mc64 sets MASK_POWERPC64,
similarly for the other di/df patterns.
I do not see any useful purpose for TARGET_E500MC64.
Should rs6000_emit_sCOND() call rs6000_emit_sISEL() instead of
modifying cstore<mode>4 ?
Thanks, David
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list