[PATCH] Further i386/x86_64 length bugfixes

[Richard Henderson]

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 03:15:32PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> Here is a small follow-up, when looking for the PLUS insns where both
>>> 128 and -128 can use shortened immediate because add*/sub* can be chosen
>>> for smaller length, I've missed cases which are inverting that test (== -128
>>> instead of == 128).
>> This is also OK for mainline.
> 
> Here is a slightly larger followup....

Ok.  Though I fear much of this is fragile.


r~