Fix for PR/39548

[Xinliang David Li]

around 54k bytes. Ok this time?

David


On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
>> The test case was further reduced: from about 16k bytes to about 8.5k
>> bytes. For a test that requires STL set to reproduce, this seems to be
>> a bare minimal.
>>
>> Ok to checkin with the test case or no test case?
>
> 8.5k looks more reasonable.  Note that you can include STL headers in the
> testcase, so maybe with that you can reduce it even further.
>
> Richad.
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, the following is a small patch for fixing PR/39548.
>>>
>>> Testing done: compiler bootstrap, gcc regression test plus lots of
>>> internal testings.
>>>
>>> Ok for mainline?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: copyprop4.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 56873 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20090326/7efa8196/attachment.bin>