Fix for PR/39548
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@google.com
Wed Mar 25 15:07:00 GMT 2009
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:02, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> I disagree, the testcase is fine. I know where it is coming from and
>> I doubt we'll get much smaller than this.
>
> But at least this should be tried. I see no reason why you can allow someone
> to bypass rules that have been followed (in some cases painfully) by dozens
> of developers. Please reconsider.
IIUC this is the bare minimum test that David could get out of the
monstrous original program. David, do you think this could be reduced
more?
Given the choice of no testcase vs large testcase, I think the latter
is preferable. If I'm in the minority, then I'm fine with no
testcase. First let's see if David thinks this could be reduced even
more.
Diego.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list