RFA: Avoid simulator timeouts on more libstdc++ tests

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:

> More generally, I actually think "simulator" is the wrong predicate.  It
> should be "slow target" (which doesn't exist as a predicate at present);
> "simulator" is just a special case of that.  A little microcontroller
> might well have the same problem.  We could honor a setting in the
> DejaGNU board file, falling back to "simulator" if the board didn't
> explicitly set the flag.

I agree.

-- Gaby