[PATCH] Fix __builtin_object_size (x, 1) regression (PR tree-optimization/39343)
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Mon Mar 2 19:33:00 GMT 2009
Hi!
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00877.html
patch broke __builtin_object_size (, 1) when unions are involved.
When another union member contains a field of the desired non-array type,
one component ref might be transformed into a different one, for which
bos will return sizeof that type instead of the possibly much larger array.
The following fixes this, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux.
I've looked also where it makes a difference during bootstrap and it seemed
to trigger just with similar cases with unions, e.g. &t->exp.operands
is no longer changed into &t->decl_minimal.context (completely unrelated,
just happens to have the same field offset), etc.
Ok for trunk?
2009-03-02 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/39343
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (maybe_fold_offset_to_address): Don't check if
COMPONENT_REF t has ARRAY_TYPE.
* gcc.dg/pr39343.c: New test.
--- gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c.jj 2009-02-20 15:56:54.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c 2009-03-02 15:46:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -1942,8 +1942,7 @@ maybe_fold_offset_to_address (tree addr,
|| (TREE_CODE (orig) == COMPONENT_REF
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (orig, 1))) == ARRAY_TYPE))
&& (TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_REF
- || (TREE_CODE (t) == COMPONENT_REF
- && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1))) == ARRAY_TYPE))
+ || TREE_CODE (t) == COMPONENT_REF)
&& !operand_equal_p (TREE_CODE (orig) == ARRAY_REF
? TREE_OPERAND (orig, 0) : orig,
TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_REF
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39343.c.jj 2009-03-02 15:52:00.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39343.c 2009-03-02 15:51:25.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/39343 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+
+extern inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) int
+foo (char *dest)
+{
+ return __builtin_object_size (dest, 1);
+}
+
+struct S
+{
+ union
+ {
+ struct { int a, b; char c, d; } f;
+ struct { struct { int a, b; char c, d[255]; } e; } g;
+ } u;
+};
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ struct S s;
+ if (foo (s.u.g.e.d) != 255)
+ abort ();
+ return 0;
+}
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list