RFA: PR other/40024 for 4.4 branch

Kai Tietz ktietz70@googlemail.com
Sat Jun 27 20:49:00 GMT 2009


2009/6/27 Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>:
> 2009/6/27 Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Kai Tietz<ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Jakub,
>>>
>>> I would like to see the patch for PR other/40024 - you applied on
>>> 2009-06-01 you applied on trunk - on 4.4 branch, too. We can into same
>>> issue on 4.4 for TLS on x86 and x64 windows targets. By testing your
>>> patch on 4.4 branch our tests for TLS ran again.
>>>
>>> So I want to ask, if you could apply it into 4.4 branch, too? Or are
>>> there any objections about it?
>>
>> The patch is ok for the 4.4/4.3 branches if you can bootstrap/regtest it
>> there on a target that uses emul-tls.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kai
>>>
>>> --
>>> |  (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
>>> | (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
>>> | (")_(") him gain world domination
>>>
>>
>
> For 4.4 I did already. For 4.3 branch I'll do it.
>
> Thanks,
> Kai
>
> --
> |  (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
> | (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
> | (")_(") him gain world domination
>

Regression test was successful for 4.3 and 4.4 branch. I committed the
patch for PR other/40024 to both branches.
Committed revision 149015 for 4.3 branch and committed revision 149016
for 4.4 branch.

Cheers,
Kai
-- 
|  (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
| (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
| (")_(") him gain world domination



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list