[PATCH 0/3] Resubmission of new implementation of SRA
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 15:40:00 GMT 2009
2009/5/29 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:57:34PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is hopefully the final version of intraprocedural SRA, addressing
>> > all some comments from Richi's (some of which were sent only to me,
>> > but they are all minor). The previous post is here:
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01628.html
>> >
>> > The biggest difference is that auxiliary statements generated to turn
>> > complex number and vector replacements which are not gimple registers
>> > into registers are created by force_gimple_operand_gsi rather than by
>> > functions of my own.
>> >
>> > Most notably, some unnecessary complex typecasting is removed and
>> > complex numbers which participate in an assignment into one of their
>> > components are dealt with by simply not making them a gimple register.
>> >
>> > The first patch is the new implementation itself. The second patch
>> > removes SRA parameters which are no longer used and the third adjusts
>> > the testsuite and adds new testcases.
>> >
>> > The whole patch set bootstraps on x86_64-linux-gnu (including Ada),
>> > and i586-suse-linux. There are no new regressions on both of these
>> > platforms.
>> >
>> > So, OK for trunk?
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>
> Great, committed as revision 147980.
>
This caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40493
--
H.J.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list