[PATCH 0/3] Resubmission of new implementation of SRA

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 15:40:00 GMT 2009


2009/5/29 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:57:34PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is hopefully the final version of intraprocedural SRA, addressing
>> > all some  comments from Richi's (some  of which were sent  only to me,
>> > but they are all minor).  The previous post is here:
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01628.html
>> >
>> > The biggest difference is  that auxiliary statements generated to turn
>> > complex number and vector  replacements which are not gimple registers
>> > into registers are created  by force_gimple_operand_gsi rather than by
>> > functions of my own.
>> >
>> > Most  notably, some  unnecessary  complex typecasting  is removed  and
>> > complex numbers which  participate in an assignment into  one of their
>> > components are dealt with by simply not making them a gimple register.
>> >
>> > The first  patch is the  new implementation itself.  The  second patch
>> > removes SRA parameters which are  no longer used and the third adjusts
>> > the testsuite and adds new testcases.
>> >
>> > The whole  patch set  bootstraps on x86_64-linux-gnu  (including Ada),
>> > and i586-suse-linux.   There are no  new regressions on both  of these
>> > platforms.
>> >
>> > So, OK for trunk?
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>
> Great, committed as revision 147980.
>

This caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40493

-- 
H.J.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list