PATCH RFA: C++ frontend: Don't warn about shifts which will not be run
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Sat Jun 13 01:24:00 GMT 2009
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the comments but I'm not clear on what the recommendation is.
>
> There isn't one, though the simplest possibility might be for those cases
> where the C++ front end relies on skip_evaluation being something
> precisely-defined rather than heuristic to change to using something other
> than skip_evaluation.
Suppose we eliminate skip_evaluation from the C and C++ frontends, since
it seems to be poorly named, and replace it with "c_parsing_sizeof_arg"
(which would also apply to typeof and alignof; better names solicited)
and "c_never_executed". This is pretty much what I did, at least in the
C frontend, but the different names would I hope make it more clear what
the variables represented. The effect would be similar: certain
warnings should not be issued when one or the other of these is true.
Ian
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list