Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot

Angelo Graziosi angelo.graziosi@alice.it
Mon Jul 27 09:23:00 GMT 2009


Ralf Wildenhues ha scritto:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:54:23AM CEST:
>> OK to install this trivial patch if it passes the build I'm running
>> right now, as well as a normal and a DESTDIR install I'll be doing
>> afterwards?
> 
> FWIW, all succeeded as expected.

Indeed!

Thanks a lot,
Angelo.

> 
>> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>> 2009-07-26  Ralf Wildenhues  <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
>>
>> 	* python/Makefile.am (install-data-local): Use DESTDIR
>> 	correctly.
>>
>> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am b/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
>> index 50cc6d9..457e45b 100644
>> --- a/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ install-data-local: gdb.py
>>  ## .la file, and any previous -gdb.py file.  This is inherently
>>  ## fragile, but there does not seem to be a better option, because
>>  ## libtool hides the real names from us.
>> -	@here=`pwd`; cd $(toolexeclibdir); \
>> +	@here=`pwd`; cd $(DESTDIR)$(toolexeclibdir); \
>>  	  for file in libstdc++*; do \
>>  	    case $$file in \
>>  	      *-gdb.py) ;; \



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list