Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
Angelo Graziosi
angelo.graziosi@alice.it
Mon Jul 27 09:23:00 GMT 2009
Ralf Wildenhues ha scritto:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:54:23AM CEST:
>> OK to install this trivial patch if it passes the build I'm running
>> right now, as well as a normal and a DESTDIR install I'll be doing
>> afterwards?
>
> FWIW, all succeeded as expected.
Indeed!
Thanks a lot,
Angelo.
>
>> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>> 2009-07-26 Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
>>
>> * python/Makefile.am (install-data-local): Use DESTDIR
>> correctly.
>>
>> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am b/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
>> index 50cc6d9..457e45b 100644
>> --- a/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ install-data-local: gdb.py
>> ## .la file, and any previous -gdb.py file. This is inherently
>> ## fragile, but there does not seem to be a better option, because
>> ## libtool hides the real names from us.
>> - @here=`pwd`; cd $(toolexeclibdir); \
>> + @here=`pwd`; cd $(DESTDIR)$(toolexeclibdir); \
>> for file in libstdc++*; do \
>> case $$file in \
>> *-gdb.py) ;; \
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list