[lto] Reverted patch for PR 39010
Sat Jan 31 19:23:00 GMT 2009
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:10:37AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Diego Novillo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > HJ,
> > I had to revert the patch you committed for PR 39010. It had
> > caused 478 regressions on x86_64 and 625 on i686. Presumably,
> > there are other places where we are off by one.
> I noticed that also. However, I believe my patch just exposed some
> latent LTO bugs.
Maybe LTO expects hash value in certain and incorrect way.
More information about the Gcc-patches