Ping: patch to remove the old RA

Vladimir Makarov vmakarov@redhat.com
Thu Jan 29 23:03:00 GMT 2009


Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:27 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> The original patches were posted on
>>>>
>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00613.html
>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00741.html
>>>>
>>>> I am sending an updated version of the patch here because a few recent IRA
>>>> patches resulted in the patch updates too.
>>>>
>>>>  * Makefile.in (RA_H): Remove.
>>>>         
>>> Is ra.h still being used? If not, can we remove ra.h now?
>>>
>>> Also ira-color.c has
>>>
>>> /* Try to assign a hard register (except for FORBIDDEN_REGS) to
>>>   allocno A and return TRUE in the case of success.  That is an
>>>   analog of retry_global_alloc for IRA.  */
>>> static bool
>>> allocno_reload_assign (ira_allocno_t a, HARD_REG_SET forbidden_regs)
>>>
>>> Since retry_global_alloc is gone, this comment should be
>>> updated.
>>>
>>>       
>> Like this patch.  OK for trunk?
>>     
>
> Ok if this was bootstrapped & tested.
>
>   
That is ok for me too.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list