patch to permit more one bypasses for insn pairs
Mon Jan 12 22:23:00 GMT 2009
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Vladimir Makarov <email@example.com> writes:
>> I've not decided yet to commit the patch to trunk now or wait for the
>> stage1. The patch should be safe because more one define_bypass were
>> prohibited and therefore no one existing automata should be affected
>> by the patch.
> Although this is safe, it is a new feature, and new features should be
> delayed until we return to stage 1 (unless of course a release manager
> approves it).
Ok. Thanks, Ian, for the remainder. I think the patch can wait for stage1.
More information about the Gcc-patches