[PATCH, c++ diagnostics] Fix c++ front end i18n problems

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 12/01/2009 10:37 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> >  I suggest you leave "candidate is" aside in the beginning and submit a patch
>> >  for the rest.  Then you can do a separate patch to fix the other issue --
>> >  otherwise you'll make the same mistake as me and the patches will lie
>> >  uncommitted for seven more years.;-)
> I don't understand this comment.

I'm suggesting to split the patch in two, to avoid making it too 
complicated which was my fault when I wrote the %s-elimination patch 
that Shujing took inspiration from.  That was 2002.

Taking candidates is/candidates into a separate patch was a natural place.

Regarding enums, my impression was that the coding standard was "no 
typedef", but it is mixed:

~/devel/gcc/gcc pbonzini$ grep typedef.*enum * | wc -l
54
~/devel/gcc/gcc pbonzini$ grep ^enum * | wc -l
382

so that objection is withdrawn.

Paolo